Global Independent Analytics
Joshua Tartakovsky
Joshua Tartakovsky

Location: USA

Specialization: Israel and the Middle East, US politics

Faced with International Silence, Brazilians Must Complicate Dilma’s Impeachment

Brazil in particular and Latin America at large should not be seen as a ‘pacified’ continent with a submissive population that can be manipulated with ease.

Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment is being backed by members of the Senate and Congress, yet Dilma, a seasoned fighter, seems to be able to find tricks to hang on a little longer and stave off the illegal impeachment. Most recently, the attorney general said that her impeachment was illegal and now Eduardo Cunha, speaker of the house, has been ordered by the court to leave his post due to accusations against him. Dilma is likely to be able to hang on for a while, but not for very long.

The central question facing the confused Brazilian people is where to go from here.

First, we must dispel certain illusions and comfortable notions concerning President Dilma Rousseff’s impeachment. What we are witnessing is not just the cynical and unconstitutional removal from power of a president who was elected by the people, but also the deafening silence of the so-called democratic Western world while the Brazilian right-wing, with its bloody history of dictatorships and torture, seeks to undemocratically snatch power once again. Of course, this is a very uncomfortable time for liberals. They would like to grab onto every small piece of evidence that convinces them that the world has not gone mad, that sanity prevails, and that the New York Times or BBC really do care about democracy in Brazil and are ready criticize undemocratic violations, regardless of whether they come from the Left or the Right. But that is not what we are seeing.

Glenn Greenwald, for example, argued that the New York Times makes clear that those who carried out the impeachment are corrupt themselves. He found his moment of victory. But a closer reading reveals the opposite. Yes, it is true that the New York Times said that the people behind the impeachment were themselves guilty of corruption. However, in the same article, the New York Times has given equal credence to the opinion of others who argued that Dilma’s impeachment is legally valid and acceptable. The reader is thus left in a confused state of mind and does not know whom to believe, but remains unaware of the actual injustice taking place, namely, the unlawful impeachment of a president who was elected by 54 million Brazilians.

In other instances, the New York Times has provided the wholly inaccurate impression that Dilma is corrupt or that the accusations against her are valid, although this in itself is a partisan view, as she has not been convicted of any wrongdoing. Similarly, it disingenuously created the impression that Lula is corrupt.

Greenwald also noted with joy that “Even The Economist, which has long despised the PT and its anti-poverty programs and wants Dilma to resign, has argued that ‘in the absence of proof of criminality, impeachment is unwarranted’ and ‘looks like a pretext for ousting an unpopular president.’” But this is also a truly naïve argument. The very same article by The Economist argues that Dilma must resign now, mentions only anti-government demonstrators, and says that Dilma’s resignation is what Brazil needs as if The Economist suddenly found in its great heart love for the Brazilian poor majority. On what basis does The Economist demand the resignation of a president of a sovereign country? If Dilma’s impeachment is unwarranted as it claims, then why must she resign?

And as noted earlier, the BBC claims to be reporting on demonstrators from ‘both sides,' while in fact depicting only anti-government demonstrators.

When the New York Times conveys the impression that both Dilma and her impeachers are corrupt, where does that leave us? With an apathetic stance towards the actual violation of democracy. With a post-modern indifference to any notion of truth.

This is not to argue that The New York Times, The Economist or the BBC must take a dogmatic partisan line. But why the double game? Why claim that Dilma’s impeachment was wrong but that she must resign anyway? Why argue that Dilma’s impeachers are just as corrupt as Dilma when she has not been found guilty?

Those who seek to blow smoke in our faces, to leave us confused and unable to see clearly that an illegal and undemocratic coup is taking place, are those who now adopt the ‘neutral’ position while failing to go deeper in the analysis. And yet, again disingenuously, leading Western media outlets refrain from taking a blatant anti-governmental line in the case of Brazil and instead choose to sow confusion and provide false impressions, thereby leaving us numb to the actual violation of democracy in real time.

Needless to say, at a time when 90% of the US media is owned by six corporations, and when BP has an active interest in Petrobras (it was absent from the Pre-salt talks, however), we can only guess that leading financial interests are hoping to dispose of Dilma, privatize the country entirely, impoverish its residents, and take over Petrobras.

The President of the federation of industries of the State of São Paulo (FIESP) said in the past that a worker does not need an hour of lunch; workers can operate the machines and eat their sandwiches at the same time. This is the kind of life Brazilian workers can expect in the coming years. Or worse.

Where does this leave Brazilians?

For one, Brazilians need to realize that the world will not save Dilma. And her going to the UN to appeal to states while seeking to circumvent the vote in Congress, was outright pathetic.

Secondly, Western financial elites probably see Brazil as easy prey precisely due to the way Brazilians tend to abhor conflict and do not like to riot. Western financial elites have most likely believed that the impeachment will pass by fairly peacefully and that a new government will be planted quickly. They may well see Brazilians as people who can be easily pacified and have no dignity.

Brazilians may be wise to learn from the example of Israel. Israeli settler youth in the occupied West Bank has taken it upon themselves to inflict damage to Palestinian land or violence against Palestinians in response to any action Palestinians take against Israelis. This modus operandi has been named “Price Tag”; it leaves the settlers hated and demonized worldwide, but has been successful. The government fears them and has not evacuated them from their homes. They may not be well-liked, but at least they are respected and/or feared. And they achieved their political goal, which is to make an Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank nearly impossible.

Brazilians should consider adopting a price tag policy in regards to the ongoing illegal impeachment. That would mean making the impeachment as difficult and painful as possible. We have already seen how Brazilian students have occupied high-schools and how MST is threatening to boycott new elections as illegitimate. Indian indigenous movements have also shown how they can fight against agribusinesses taking over their lands. The Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem Teto and Movimento dos Sem Terra can block roads and, given their connections to the governing PT, they just need to realize that it’s now or never. The goal must be to make a return to normalcy as difficult as possible and disrupt ordinary life - a price tag for impeachment.

This would achieve several goals:

  1. It would radicalize the population further so that they will be able to resist future inhumane decisions by the government and will not be subject to serfdom.
  2. It will complicate the plans of the Western financial elites who hope for an easy takeover of the country and will put hurdles in their path thereby winning time for the Brazilian population. It will also make them think twice about carrying out such plans in the future elsewhere.
  3. It will restore dignity to Brazilians and remind others that Brazil, though a young democracy, is still a democracy whose citizenry will not tolerate illegal coups.

 Brazil in particular and Latin America at large should not be seen as a ‘pacified’ continent with a submissive population that can be manipulated with ease.

Related ARTICLES

The political components of fiscal crisis in Brazil

The political components of fiscal crisis in Brazil

According to Machiavelli, the prince can govern a state “o per fortuna o per virtù”. However, the equation between fortuna and virtú considered by Machiavelli becomes complex in multiparty political regimes.

08 January 2016

by Natalia Rezende

 ARGENTINA’S NEW FOREIGN POLICY

ARGENTINA’S NEW FOREIGN POLICY

Macri wants to play a multipolar role, after breaking the axis with Venezuela.

08 January 2016

Opinion: 1

by Enric Ravello Barber

The diplomatic dwarf irritates the Goliath once again

The diplomatic dwarf irritates the Goliath once again

Last year the Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor called Brazil a “diplomatic dwarf”, but it seems that the country just got taller

05 January 2016

by Pedro Marin

POPULAR ARTICLES

Not Found

OPINION

Vladimir Golstein

Vladimir Golstein

The Danderous Acceptance of Donald Trump

James N. Green

James N. Green

Politics in Brazil: Fasten Your Seat Belts!

Barbara H. Peterson

Barbara H. Peterson

Health officials confirm spread of Zika virus through sexual contact in Texas, first in US

Danny Haiphong

Danny Haiphong

WHY IS OTTO(SUPER)MAN ERDOGAN LOSING HIS CHARISMA?

Miray Aslan

Miray Aslan

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Navid Nasr

Navid Nasr

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Writers

chief editor

Joshua Tartakovsky

Analysis should serve as a method to better understand our world, not to obscure it.

Materials: 42

Specialization: Israel and the Middle East, US politics

Materials: 7

Specialization: Balkans, NATO and EU policies, Strategic communications

Materials: 3

Specialization: Foreign politics, Immigration, Human rights.

Materials: 2

Specialization: Political Science, Social Anthropology

Materials: 3

Specialization: Eastern Europe

Materials: 14

Specialization: Industrial Safety, Corporations

Materials: 12

Specialization: Eastern Europe, Labor movement

Materials: 3

Specialization: American history, way of life, and principles

Danielle Ryan

Ireland

Materials: 10

Specialization: US foreign policy, US-Russia relations and media bias

Materials: 20

Specialization: War, Racism, Capitalist exploitation, Civil rights

Materials: 8

Specialization: Modern Japanese History, Modern Chinese History, Military History, History of Counterinsurgency, History of Disobedience, Dynamics of Atrocities in Wartime

Dovid Katz

Lithuania

Materials: 3

Specialization: Holocaust Revisionism and Geopolitics; East European Far Right & Human Rights; Yiddish Studies & Litvak Culture

Materials: 20

Specialization: History, Catalunya, Spain, Geopolitics, Nationalism in Europe, Islamization, Immigration

Materials: 5

Materials: 3

Specialization: migration, international relations

Materials: 1

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy and strategies, BRICS/SCO

Materials: 19

Specialization: Balkans, Yugoslavia

Materials: 10

Specialization: Jihadist Groups, Islamic Terrorism, Global Security

Materials: 4

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 4

Specialization: Media and government relations

Materials: 2

Specialization: Latin America, Brazil

Jay Watts

Canada

Materials: 2

Specialization: History, Marxism-Leninism, Imperialism, Anti-imperialism.

Materials: 2

Specialization: International Relations, Sociology, Geostrategy

Materials: 1

Specialization: civil rights

Lionel Baland

Belgium

Materials: 22

Specialization: Euroscepticism, Patriotic parties of Europe

Maram Susli

Australia

Materials: 3

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights, Racism, US politics

Materials: 1

Specialization: geopolitics, economics

Max J. Schindler

Palestine-Israel

Materials: 9

Specialization: Politics

Miray Aslan

Turkey

Materials: 12

Specialization: Media, Politics

Materials: 5

Specialization: Politics, International relations

Navid Nasr

Croatia

Materials: 13

Specialization: Global security, Politics

Materials: 9

Specialization: Development of European Union, Non-governmental organizations, Politics and economics in Baltic States

Materials: 9

Specialization: Greece, Crisis of the US hegemony; Israel / Occupied Palestine, Oppression of Black people in the US

Materials: 4

Specialization: geopolitics, Russia, USSR

Pedro Marin

Brazil

Materials: 17

Specialization: Latin America, Ukraine, North Korea

Materials: 13

Specialization: Sustainable development, International relations, Comparative European politics, European integration, Eastern European politics and EU-Russia relations

Materials: 8

Specialization: Politics

Materials: 16

Specialization: Counterterrorist Finance

Seyit Aldogan

Greece

Materials: 3

Specialization: ISIS, Middle East, Globalization, Migrant crisis

Materials: 1

Specialization: Head of "Srebrenica Historical Project"

Materials: 3

Specialization: Economy, Social politics

Stevan Gajic

Serbia

Materials: 1

Specialization: Full time researcher at the Institute for European Studies

Materials: 5

Specialization: Geopolitics, Geoeconomics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights

Tobias Nase

Germany

Materials: 8

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy, Ukraine

Valerijus Simulik

Lithuania

Materials: 2

Specialization: Politics and economics in Baltic States, education and science, non - governmental organizations, globalization and EU

Van Gelis

Greece

Materials: 17

Specialization: Middle East

Materials: 1

Specialization: Kosovo, Serbia, Belgrad bombing

Materials: 5

Specialization: international relations, Russia

toTop