Global Independent Analytics
Joshua Tartakovsky
Joshua Tartakovsky

Location: USA

Specialization: Israel and the Middle East, US politics

Trump We Can Believe In: New York Times makes clear why anti-imperialists MUST support Donald Trump

Trump doesn’t want the immense US military industrial complex to continue to decide the fate of nations. If countries want US bases there, let them pay for it. Why should the US pay for it?

Donald Trump’s recent statements to the New York Times on world affairs make it crystal clear why every genuine anti-imperialist, any person who supports countries maintaining their sovereignty and getting their act together on their own, anyone who is sick and tired of the Saudis and of millions dying from the arrogant and foolish campaign to “bring democracy” to the Middle East, must support Trump. It is crystal clear.

But in order to explain why this is the case, the 
New York Times’ coverage of his words must be analyzed. It is the liberal imperialist paper par excellence.

First, the headline: “In Donald Trump’s Worldview, America Comes First, and Everybody Else Pays.”

How shocking!

Trump doesn’t want the immense US military industrial complex to continue to decide the fate of nations. If countries want US bases there, let them pay for it. Why should the US pay for it? Of course, liberal imperialists who want more wars and profit from wars, want the US to maintain its aggressive military presence around the world, which is why Trump’s ideas shock them. They claim he thinks “America comes first” as if this was something bad. But do US bases help these nations? Do they help the American people? Of course not. They are imperialist and are used to conquer nations so contracts can be made for a few corporations (Halliburton, anyone?) and the profit made does not reach the American people.

The New York Times then says:

Donald J. Trump, the Republican presidential front-runner, said that if elected, he might halt purchases of oil from Saudi Arabia and other Arab allies unless they commit ground troops to the fight against the Islamic State or “substantially reimburse” the United States for combating the militant group, which threatens their stability.

Wow. Finally someone who speaks about Saudi Arabia, the international sponsor of terrorism that maintains the petro-dollar’s hegemony. Trump takes the common sense approach: if Saudi Arabia wants to be taken seriously, it has to fight the Islamic State. Now, of course we know that Saudi Arabia supports the Islamic State. But what Trump is actually implying is: if Saudi Arabia wants us to take it seriously, it has to clean up its act so we can finish off ISIS together. And, as anyone who follows Trump knows, Trump is against toppling the Syrian president since it would destabilize Syria and won’t be good for the Syrian people and he hates ISIS.

Trump then takes a jab at Saudi Arabia.

If Saudi Arabia was without the cloak of American protection,” Mr. Trump said during a 100-minute interview on foreign policy, spread over two phone calls on Friday, “I don’t think it would be around.”

So, basically Saudi Arabia is a useless parasite that relies on US protection. It cannot even defend itself. Americans don’t like Saudi Arabia. In fact, they hate it. Trump expressed his clear disdain for these Wahabi fanatics. Of course, the New York Times may have preferred Trump not put America first and  protect Saudi Arabia.

Then:

He also said he would be open to allowing Japan and South Korea to build their own nuclear arsenals rather than depend on the American nuclear umbrella for their protection against North Korea and China. If the United States “keeps on its path, its current path of weakness, they’re going to want to have that anyway, with or without me discussing it,” Mr. Trump said.

What’s wrong about that? North Korea is not a threat to South Korea! It has long insisted that it arms itself only to protect itself from a US invasion, and that it would disarm if US bases and nuclear weapons would be taken out of the entire peninsula.  Let South Korea renegotiate with North Korea without US interference. But that’s not what the liberal imperialists want. They want the US to “protect” South Korea and then invade North Korea so the US market can take over the country.

Somewhere later on:

He again faulted the Obama administration’s handling of the negotiations with Iran last year — “It would have been so much better if they had walked away a few times,” he said — but offered only one new idea about how he would change its content: Ban Iran’s trade with North Korea.

So, Trump did the forbidden. He dared disagree with a deal Obama made with Iran. He thinks it is a bad deal. What a sacrereligious thought! Trump advocated “only one new idea.” How limited of him. What is that idea? Banning Iran’s trade with North Korea. Not bombing the two countries, just banning trade between two particular countries. How limited is his imagination! The poor Iranians and North Koreans would have much preferred if he would have been abit more creative and would have thought of more ideas, like sanctions so that there will be a scarcity of much-needed medicines on the counters, or invading their countries with US troops.

Then:

Mr. Mr. Trump struck similar themes when he discussed the future of NATO, which he called “unfair, economically, to us,” and said he was open to an alternative organization focused on counterterrorism. He argued that the best way to halt China’s placement of military airfields and antiaircraft batteries on reclaimed islands in the South China Sea was to threaten its access to American markets.

So Trump does not want to militarize the South China Sea and send US boats to patrol its borders and intimidate it. He wants to protect the US economy by blocking Chinese products. What’s so awful about that? Countries can protect their economies. Must Amerians be forced to buy Chinese goods? Why can’t companies relocate to US and open factories for American workers? 

Trump also dislikes NATO. Yes, the same NATO that destroyed Serbia, Iraq, Libya, the list goes on and on… Indeed, NATO is unfair to America. Did the American people, not corporations, ever benefit from any of NATO’s many “humanitarian bombing” campaigns??

Then Trump says he is against the Bush doctrine of “spreading democracy” around the world, which we know has only resulted in chaos and misery in the Middle East and in hundreds of thousands of dead with no democracy at all.  Trump says he wants to put America first, and for America to watch out for its own interests. Makes sense to me. Only that according to the New York Times perverse version of events, bombing Iraq is not putting America first. It’s caring about the people of Iraq.

Then:

At no point did he express any belief that American forces deployed on military bases around the world were by themselves valuable to the United States, though Republican and Democratic administrations have for decades argued that they are essential to deterring military adventurism, protecting commerce and gathering intelligence.

Indeed, US bases all around the globe are not valubale to the American people and they themselves are the emboidment of “military adventurism” which have helped no one. Just ask the people of Vietnam. Ask the people of Germany if they want NATO bases on their land, now that the USSR is not there. Just ask them.

“Protecting commerce”? You must be kidding. Saudi Arabia’s war on Yemen has disrupted commerce between China and Europe.  US bases are not protecting commerce!

The reader is welcome now to read the New York Times article for himself or herself, since hopefully one gets the point by now. All that one needs is a critical mind. But two last points:

Mr. Trump was not impressed with Ms. Merkel’s handling of the migrant crisis, however: “Germany is being destroyed by Merkel’s naïveté, or worse,” he said. He suggested that Germany and the Gulf nations should pay for the “safe zones” he wants to set up in Syria for refugees, and for protecting them once built.

Let the migrants stay in Syria, they are protected there by the Syrian Army. The Syrians just liberated Palmyra. Why must migrants come to Europe? Europe has massive unemployment already. There have been sex attacks in all over Europe, and acts of terrorism in Paris and Brussels. Does it really make sense for Merkel to take on so many migrants who will be paid slave labor when as a result Germans will lose their jobs? Well, only if she does not have the good of the German people in mind! Does emptying countries of their inhabitants and sending them all to the West help anyone when the global economy and domesitc economies are in a deep crisis? Merkel agreed to take on a million of migrants while she advocates the departure of President Assad which would result in chaos. Why must we allow her to feel good about the destruction, deaths, rapes and mulitation her sickening policy of supporting jihadist rebels caused, by all of a sudden pretending to be Mother Theresa and taking Syrians after destroying Syria?

And one last point, where no explanation should be needed:|

Told that sanctions under United States law still bar most American companies from doing business with Iran, he said: “So, how stupid is that? We give them the money and we now say, ‘Go buy Airbus instead of Boeing,’ right?”

Related ARTICLES

NO MATTER WHAT, THE ESTABLISHMENT WILL HAVE THEIR CONTROLLED CANDIDATES IN BOTH MAJOR PARTIES.

NO MATTER WHAT, THE ESTABLISHMENT WILL HAVE THEIR CONTROLLED CANDIDATES IN BOTH MAJOR PARTIES.

The problem for the establishment this year is that there is not one, but two anti-establishment candidates in the race: one in each party.

18 April 2016

by Chuck Baldwin

Why would AIPAC dump Trump?

Why would AIPAC dump Trump?

It is possible that AIPAC was worried that Trump wouldn’t be pro-Israel enough, after last week’s gaffe when Trump said he would be “neutral” between Israel and the Palestinians.

08 April 2016

by Max J. Schindler

POPULAR ARTICLES

Not Found

OPINION

Vladimir Golstein

Vladimir Golstein

The Danderous Acceptance of Donald Trump

James N. Green

James N. Green

Politics in Brazil: Fasten Your Seat Belts!

Barbara H. Peterson

Barbara H. Peterson

Health officials confirm spread of Zika virus through sexual contact in Texas, first in US

Danny Haiphong

Danny Haiphong

WHY IS OTTO(SUPER)MAN ERDOGAN LOSING HIS CHARISMA?

Miray Aslan

Miray Aslan

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Navid Nasr

Navid Nasr

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Writers

chief editor

Joshua Tartakovsky

Analysis should serve as a method to better understand our world, not to obscure it.

Materials: 42

Specialization: Israel and the Middle East, US politics

Materials: 7

Specialization: Balkans, NATO and EU policies, Strategic communications

Materials: 3

Specialization: Foreign politics, Immigration, Human rights.

Materials: 2

Specialization: Political Science, Social Anthropology

Materials: 3

Specialization: Eastern Europe

Materials: 14

Specialization: Industrial Safety, Corporations

Materials: 12

Specialization: Eastern Europe, Labor movement

Materials: 3

Specialization: American history, way of life, and principles

Danielle Ryan

Ireland

Materials: 10

Specialization: US foreign policy, US-Russia relations and media bias

Materials: 20

Specialization: War, Racism, Capitalist exploitation, Civil rights

Materials: 8

Specialization: Modern Japanese History, Modern Chinese History, Military History, History of Counterinsurgency, History of Disobedience, Dynamics of Atrocities in Wartime

Dovid Katz

Lithuania

Materials: 3

Specialization: Holocaust Revisionism and Geopolitics; East European Far Right & Human Rights; Yiddish Studies & Litvak Culture

Materials: 20

Specialization: History, Catalunya, Spain, Geopolitics, Nationalism in Europe, Islamization, Immigration

Materials: 5

Materials: 3

Specialization: migration, international relations

Materials: 1

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy and strategies, BRICS/SCO

Materials: 19

Specialization: Balkans, Yugoslavia

Materials: 10

Specialization: Jihadist Groups, Islamic Terrorism, Global Security

Materials: 4

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 4

Specialization: Media and government relations

Materials: 2

Specialization: Latin America, Brazil

Jay Watts

Canada

Materials: 2

Specialization: History, Marxism-Leninism, Imperialism, Anti-imperialism.

Materials: 2

Specialization: International Relations, Sociology, Geostrategy

Materials: 1

Specialization: civil rights

Lionel Baland

Belgium

Materials: 22

Specialization: Euroscepticism, Patriotic parties of Europe

Maram Susli

Australia

Materials: 3

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights, Racism, US politics

Materials: 1

Specialization: geopolitics, economics

Max J. Schindler

Palestine-Israel

Materials: 9

Specialization: Politics

Miray Aslan

Turkey

Materials: 12

Specialization: Media, Politics

Materials: 5

Specialization: Politics, International relations

Navid Nasr

Croatia

Materials: 13

Specialization: Global security, Politics

Materials: 9

Specialization: Development of European Union, Non-governmental organizations, Politics and economics in Baltic States

Materials: 9

Specialization: Greece, Crisis of the US hegemony; Israel / Occupied Palestine, Oppression of Black people in the US

Materials: 4

Specialization: geopolitics, Russia, USSR

Pedro Marin

Brazil

Materials: 17

Specialization: Latin America, Ukraine, North Korea

Materials: 13

Specialization: Sustainable development, International relations, Comparative European politics, European integration, Eastern European politics and EU-Russia relations

Materials: 8

Specialization: Politics

Materials: 16

Specialization: Counterterrorist Finance

Seyit Aldogan

Greece

Materials: 3

Specialization: ISIS, Middle East, Globalization, Migrant crisis

Materials: 1

Specialization: Head of "Srebrenica Historical Project"

Materials: 3

Specialization: Economy, Social politics

Stevan Gajic

Serbia

Materials: 1

Specialization: Full time researcher at the Institute for European Studies

Materials: 5

Specialization: Geopolitics, Geoeconomics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights

Tobias Nase

Germany

Materials: 8

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy, Ukraine

Valerijus Simulik

Lithuania

Materials: 2

Specialization: Politics and economics in Baltic States, education and science, non - governmental organizations, globalization and EU

Van Gelis

Greece

Materials: 17

Specialization: Middle East

Materials: 1

Specialization: Kosovo, Serbia, Belgrad bombing

Materials: 5

Specialization: international relations, Russia

toTop