Global Independent Analytics
Dovid Katz
Dovid Katz

Location: Lithuania

Specialization: Holocaust Revisionism and Geopolitics; East European Far Right & Human Rights; Yiddish Studies & Litvak Culture

LITHUANIA: WHERE THE GOVERNMENT AGREES (IN PART) WITH NEO-NAZI MARCHERS

Instead of “Juden raus” or “Poles and Russians go home” these city-center marches on cherished independence days just glorify local Holocaust collaborators

I am a Jewish-looking, Jewish-sounding guy from Brooklyn who has been happily based for close to seventeen years in Vilnius, the beautiful Lithuanian capital, and am proud of many Lithuanian friends. It is not an antisemitic country. The overwhelmingly tolerant people of the capital sport a robust good humor and multicultural quilting. The problem is with what the foreign diplomats stationed here call The Elites: government, academia, media, the arts and more, where there is often to be found a national obsession, not with the (genuinely) grand history of Lithuania over a thousand years of European history, but with — glorifying Holocaust perpetrators.

How could that be?

It is verily hard to fathom this without having lived in the region (this is not just about Lithuania). The “nationalist classes” have decided as a point of national pride to glorify the 1941 butchers of their Jewish neighbors not directly because of that voluntary and often gleeful Holocaust participation (that helped result in 96.4% of Lithuanian Jewry being massacred, the largest percentage in Europe), but because of a national myth of a “great revolt” of June 1941 that supposedly drove out the Soviet army (that had occupied the country, and the other two Baltic states, Latvia and Estonia, from the preceding summer onward). The state-sponsored “Museum of Genocide Victims” on the capital’s main boulevard devotes one of its main halls to glorifying that “revolt” without bothering to mention two things: first, that the main “actual accomplishment” of these “rebels” (known as the “white armbanders” for their quick-make “uniform”) was to set out on the murder, rape and pillage of civilian Jewish neighbors, even before the first German soldiers set foot in the country several days later; and second, that the Soviet army made its rapid flight eastward to Russia because of Hitler’s invasion (Operation Barbarossa), the largest invasion in human history, not because of the white-armbanded fascists associated with the LAF (Lithuanian Activist Front) who are the extolled heroes at the museum.  Untold thousands of naive Western visitors (even New York Times reporters) are grotesquely misinformed each year.

Back on the gold-paved road to NATO and EU accession, the three Baltic states set up commissions to study both Nazi and Soviet crimes, to prove to the West (and their influential Jewish organizations) that they were taking the Holocaust seriously, while in reality they were pursuing a cunning far-right revisionist Double Genocide model of World War II history. Once European Union and NATO memberships were in the bag, by 2004, previous self-control on these issues crumbled, and in addition to museums that glorify Hitlerist collaborators and purvey a bogus history, new and unsavory (and wholly unpredicted) scenarios would play out.

From 2006, the Genocide Research Center (a lavish state-sponsored institution), state prosecutors and top editors of an antisemitic daily paper contrived a campaign to defame and prosecute Holocaust survivors who were alive only because they escaped the ghettos to join up with the anti-Nazi resistance in the forests of Lithuania. Needless to say, these folks are heroes of the very free world that joining the EU and NATO is all about. It was all part of a weird attempt to “equalize” the tens of thousands of Nazi collaborators on one side with the handful of survivors of genocide who were in effect saved by fighting with the Soviet-sponsored partisans, in a part of the world where the Soviet Union was the only force providing serious (and ultimately successful) resistance to the Nazis.

In 2008, neo-Nazi marches were added into the noxious cocktail. Most democracies have fringe groups at the political extremes, and peaceful demonstrations are in fact protected by laws of free speech. And so it was in Lithuania. But from 2008 onward, authorities started gifting the very center of its two main cities, on cherished independence days, to the neo-Nazis, offering a de-facto conveyance of legitimization that oversteps the bounds of typical state choices in the realm of free speech.

Lithuania has two independence days, both revered by residents of diverse background: February 16th, for the day in 1918 when Lithuanian independence was proudly proclaimed after World War I; and March 11th, for the day in 1990, when Lithuania’s leaders risked their lives to declare independence from the Soviet Union, an act that played its due role in the very unraveling of the USSR. In 2008, the capital city, Vilnius (Vilna), was offered up on the March 11th independence day for a neo-Nazi march that featured “Juden raus” as well as a rhyme telling children to “kill that little Jew on the ladder.” It wasn’t long before the second city, Kaunas (Kovno) started giving its own city center to the far-rightists on February 16th each year.

For many years, a small crew of around five to seven of us from our local Defending History team have been on hand to silently protest both marches by following them and talking about the victims and their culture. On numerous occasions, we have been joined by just one foreign Jewish personality, Efraim Zuroff, director of the Simon Wiesenthal’s Israel office, while most Jewish organizations, local and international alike, fear being in the bad books of the Lithuanian government that hosts lavish Jewish events. Some years we were joined by local anti-fascist youth but after they were subject to police harassment in 2013, that has dwindled to a trickle (the same police treat us foreign-born protesters royally and provide us with exquisite protection and courtesy; violent incidents are not wanted). Not least in the context of current politics, where any who disagree with Holocaust revisionism and obfuscation are rapidly labelled as Putinist pawns. More on that another day.

*

Fast forward to 2016. We find ourselves now smack in between the February 16th and March 11th marches in the city centers of Kaunas and Vilnius, respectively.

Early on Tuesday the 16th of February, Evaldas Balčiūnas, a courageous truth-teller harassed by prosecutors for years for telling the truth about the Holocaust; Milan Chersonski, who was editor of the Jewish community’s newspaper from 1999 to 2011; Julius Norwilla, a former protestant pastor, and a few others prepare for our annual journey to ice-cold midwinter Kaunas. This year, there were fewer neo-Nazis at the event which starts at a central park and proceeds to the interwar presidential palace over several hours. There were some 250 to 300 “steadies” with up to 250 more who joined in at some part of the route. Two of the best-known personalities on hand were Julius Panka, chairman of the National Union of Lithuanian Nationalist Youth, and Ričardas Čekutis, a former “chief specialist” at the state sponsored Genocide Center. A number of annual aspects have become rituals: our letter to the mayor of Kaunas, his failure to stop, move or even condemn the march each year, and the hefty and highly professional police presence.

The February 16th Kaunas marchers, like their Vilnius counterparts, have long agreed with authorities to desist from organized bullhorned shouts by parade marshals that mention Jews, Poles, Russians, Roma, Gays, and other Others, and to “minimize” swastikas. Although the swastika was legalized in Lithuania in 2010, two years after Nazi and Soviet symbols were “equally” banned, the PR units at the highest levels of government have tried to keep them away from events observed by foreigners. The “grand solution” has been “designer swastikas,” most frequently the “Lithuanian swastika” (with its added little four lines at the tips) and ever new annual design innovations in curvature and directionality.

Photo: DefendingHistory.com

The two most frequent chants were “Lietuva Lietuviams” (Lithuania For Lithuanians!) and, in keeping up with current events, a slogan against immigrants and refugees.

From the international point of view, one might say that it is sad that an EU/NATO democracy started to gift the centers of its two main cities on its most cherished two days to these groups of far-right groups on its cherished independence days after securing EU/NATO membership. But many things in life are sad, and life goes on. Nevertheless there is something very special about this march and the others in the region like it.

The front banner of the march from start to finish bore words that translate “We Know Our Nation’s Heroes” and lo and behold, underneath are the faces of six Nazi collaborators, five of whom are implicated in Holocaust participation or collaboration. From left to right on the banner, they are: Adolfas Ramanauskas-Vanagas, Jonas Noreika, Povilas Plechavičius, Kazys Škirpa, Antanas Baltūsis-Žvejas, and Juozas Ambrazevičius-Brazaitis. Five of the six have been among the major Hitlerist personalities whose adulation by the Genocide Center and others has caused some international protest in recent years.

The de facto upshot is that by legally flaunting this banner through central Kaunas for the entirety of the march on independence day these marchers are in effect celebrating the ethnic purification of their city by the genocide of its 30,000 Jewish citizens. There was not a peep from the same state officials who give “Useful Jewish Idiots” (known here as UJIs) from around the world royal welcomes and perks at grand events dedicated to Jewish commemoration and culture.

Photo: DefendingHistory.com

While mentions of Jews and other specific groups have not appeared on sanctioned signs carried by the marchers themselves, as part of tacit arrangements with authorities, for some years now, they are never hard to find among the adulating onlookers from the sidelines. This year, a sign carried by two young ladies (one apparently a high school student), read, in translation: “‘We, (Jews) will turn Europe into a mixture of Asian people — Negroes, ruled by Jews…’ — R. Coudenhove-Kalergi, ‘father’ of the European Union. NO TO THE ISLAMIZATION OF LITHUANIA!”

Photo: Milan Chersonski for DefendingHistory.com

The most inspiring scene of the day was the sight of three courageous young protesters, who told us they were not affiliated with any group. They carried a banner within sight of the march that read, in translation: “Lithuania — Not the Third Reich”.

Photo: DefendingHistory.com

Over the past year, Lithuania has invested a lot in Jewish and Israel-related projects, including trips by both the prime minister and the president to Israel in late 2015. Investment is particularly sought from wealthy South African Jews of Lithuanian descent who are understandably eager for EU passports these days, and who are occasionally mobilized to become apologists for the state’s Holocaust antics.

Now, on the eve of March 2016, the president and prime minister of Lithuania have before them in the coming days a splendid opportunity to arrange for the upcoming neo-Nazi march in central Vilnius on March 11th to be reassigned to another day and another place.

A particular responsibility falls this year on the dashing young new mayor of Vilnius, Remigijus Šimašius, who has taken the trouble during his first year in office to put up expensive trilingual Lithuanian-English-Yiddish plaques to mark public retaining walls made of Jewish gravestones, which are, as he puts it,  “an example of the barbaric policy pursued by the Soviet authorities.” Last summer, the mayor received a delegation of top rabbis who begged him to move a new convention center project away from the old Jewish cemetery (still no answer on that one, despite a massive international outcry). We may now, no doubt, expect him to ban (or at least reassign to another time and place) this year’s second neo-Nazi spectacle, on the March 11th independence day, that glorifies the Nazi barbarism that brought genocide to his city and country, that is at present still slated for the center of his city, a city once known (and for tourism and PR purposes still branded), The Jerusalem of Lithuania.

Related ARTICLES

NATO’s Wish List: de-Finlandization in Europe

NATO’s Wish List: de-Finlandization in Europe

NATO is currently working hard to make Finland and Sweden join the military bloc. De-Finlandization is clearly high on the agenda.

25 May 2016

by Normunds Grostins

US warship dangerously close to Russian coast?

US warship dangerously close to Russian coast?

A little context always puts things into better perspective, so here we go. Grab an atlas.

18 April 2016

by Danielle Ryan

What are European Values and What Do They Mean?

What are European Values and What Do They Mean?

Our values – usually called "European values" – were a staple of discussions in the 1990s.

04 April 2016

by Patrick Armstrong

POPULAR ARTICLES

Not Found

OPINION

Vladimir Golstein

Vladimir Golstein

The Danderous Acceptance of Donald Trump

James N. Green

James N. Green

Politics in Brazil: Fasten Your Seat Belts!

Barbara H. Peterson

Barbara H. Peterson

Health officials confirm spread of Zika virus through sexual contact in Texas, first in US

Danny Haiphong

Danny Haiphong

WHY IS OTTO(SUPER)MAN ERDOGAN LOSING HIS CHARISMA?

Miray Aslan

Miray Aslan

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Navid Nasr

Navid Nasr

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Writers

chief editor

Joshua Tartakovsky

Analysis should serve as a method to better understand our world, not to obscure it.

Materials: 42

Specialization: Israel and the Middle East, US politics

Materials: 7

Specialization: Balkans, NATO and EU policies, Strategic communications

Materials: 3

Specialization: Foreign politics, Immigration, Human rights.

Materials: 2

Specialization: Political Science, Social Anthropology

Materials: 3

Specialization: Eastern Europe

Materials: 14

Specialization: Industrial Safety, Corporations

Materials: 12

Specialization: Eastern Europe, Labor movement

Materials: 3

Specialization: American history, way of life, and principles

Danielle Ryan

Ireland

Materials: 10

Specialization: US foreign policy, US-Russia relations and media bias

Materials: 20

Specialization: War, Racism, Capitalist exploitation, Civil rights

Materials: 8

Specialization: Modern Japanese History, Modern Chinese History, Military History, History of Counterinsurgency, History of Disobedience, Dynamics of Atrocities in Wartime

Dovid Katz

Lithuania

Materials: 3

Specialization: Holocaust Revisionism and Geopolitics; East European Far Right & Human Rights; Yiddish Studies & Litvak Culture

Materials: 20

Specialization: History, Catalunya, Spain, Geopolitics, Nationalism in Europe, Islamization, Immigration

Materials: 5

Materials: 3

Specialization: migration, international relations

Materials: 1

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy and strategies, BRICS/SCO

Materials: 19

Specialization: Balkans, Yugoslavia

Materials: 10

Specialization: Jihadist Groups, Islamic Terrorism, Global Security

Materials: 4

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 4

Specialization: Media and government relations

Materials: 2

Specialization: Latin America, Brazil

Jay Watts

Canada

Materials: 2

Specialization: History, Marxism-Leninism, Imperialism, Anti-imperialism.

Materials: 2

Specialization: International Relations, Sociology, Geostrategy

Materials: 1

Specialization: civil rights

Lionel Baland

Belgium

Materials: 22

Specialization: Euroscepticism, Patriotic parties of Europe

Maram Susli

Australia

Materials: 3

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights, Racism, US politics

Materials: 1

Specialization: geopolitics, economics

Max J. Schindler

Palestine-Israel

Materials: 9

Specialization: Politics

Miray Aslan

Turkey

Materials: 12

Specialization: Media, Politics

Materials: 5

Specialization: Politics, International relations

Navid Nasr

Croatia

Materials: 13

Specialization: Global security, Politics

Materials: 9

Specialization: Development of European Union, Non-governmental organizations, Politics and economics in Baltic States

Materials: 9

Specialization: Greece, Crisis of the US hegemony; Israel / Occupied Palestine, Oppression of Black people in the US

Materials: 4

Specialization: geopolitics, Russia, USSR

Pedro Marin

Brazil

Materials: 17

Specialization: Latin America, Ukraine, North Korea

Materials: 13

Specialization: Sustainable development, International relations, Comparative European politics, European integration, Eastern European politics and EU-Russia relations

Materials: 8

Specialization: Politics

Materials: 16

Specialization: Counterterrorist Finance

Seyit Aldogan

Greece

Materials: 3

Specialization: ISIS, Middle East, Globalization, Migrant crisis

Materials: 1

Specialization: Head of "Srebrenica Historical Project"

Materials: 3

Specialization: Economy, Social politics

Stevan Gajic

Serbia

Materials: 1

Specialization: Full time researcher at the Institute for European Studies

Materials: 5

Specialization: Geopolitics, Geoeconomics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights

Tobias Nase

Germany

Materials: 8

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy, Ukraine

Valerijus Simulik

Lithuania

Materials: 2

Specialization: Politics and economics in Baltic States, education and science, non - governmental organizations, globalization and EU

Van Gelis

Greece

Materials: 17

Specialization: Middle East

Materials: 1

Specialization: Kosovo, Serbia, Belgrad bombing

Materials: 5

Specialization: international relations, Russia

toTop