Global Independent Analytics
Barbara H. Peterson
Barbara H. Peterson

Location: USA

Specialization: Industrial Safety, Corporations

Monsanto, EPA Fabricate Safety of Roundup

EPA practices false advertising at its utmost, and no one seems to care when the life and health are in question?

It appears that either the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is in collusion with Monsanto, the producer, and seller of the world’s most highly used herbicide, Roundup, or it is staffed with people who don’t know how to read or correlate information at the most basic level.

Do you wonder why worldwide disease rates have skyrocketed since the introduction and widespread use of Roundup, Monsanto’s proprietary solution to the weed problem? Roundup is a Glyphosate formulation, designed to kill every plant but the genetically engineered ones that have been created in a lab to be resistant to it.

But is that all this herbicide kills?

According to a report titled GE Crops, Glyphosate, and the Deterioration of Health in the US by Nancy L. Swanson, Andre Leu, Jon Abrahamson, and Bradley Wallet, published in the Journal of Organic Systems in 2014, which corroborated the work of Samsel and Seneff:

A huge increase in the incidence and prevalence of chronic diseases has been reported in the United States (US) over the last 20 years. Similar increases have been seen globally. The herbicide glyphosate was introduced in 1974, and its use is accelerating with the advent of herbicide-tolerant genetically engineered (GE) crops. The evidence is mounting that glyphosate interferes with many metabolic processes in plants and animals and glyphosate residues have been detected in both. Glyphosate disrupts the endocrine system and the balance of gut bacteria, it damages DNA and is a driver of mutations that lead to cancer.

Yet, despite this alarming correlation, not only Monsanto but the EPA -- that governmental body supposedly meant to care about the environment (which, you would assume, also includes us, humans) -- claim that Roundup/Glyphosate is perfectly safe for use in our food supply, water supply, to be sprayed near our schools, all over our skies, and on every bit of soil that grows genetically engineered crops, as well as anywhere we want to kill living plants.

According to a review paper [1] compiled by Rosemary Mason, MB ChB FRCA, titled Glyphosate: Destructor of Human Health and Biodiversity,

Glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide, is destroying human and animal health as a result of disruption of gut bacteria. Two key problems caused by glyphosate in the diet are nutritional deficiencies, especially minerals and essential amino acids, and systemic toxicity.

And yet, increased usage continues. Charles M. Benbrook documented Glyphosate usage worldwide in his paper titled Trends in glyphosate herbicide use in the United States and globally, in which he states:

Total worldwide glyphosate use (agricultural plus non-agricultural) rose more than 12-fold from about 67 million kg in 1995 to 826 million kg in 2014.

That’s a whole lot of Glyphosate, folks.

There are those who claim that correlation is not causation, and with that, this writer can agree unless correlation becomes increasingly concentric, and a common denominator emerges. And that common denominator is becoming clearer by the minute: Glyphosate-based herbicides, which are known by the trade name of Roundup.

With this information in hand, the next question we must ask is:

Is what the EPA approved as “safe” in its Assessment of Ecological Risk the same product that is being sold across the counter of just about every store dealing in herbicides in the country and most parts of the world? The answer to that million dollar question is a resounding NO!

To put it bluntly, what Monsanto is selling and what the EPA approved as safe are two different things.

Glyphosate chronic long-term safety studies are a sham

Research Scientist Anthony Samsel has discovered that the chronic long-term safety studies on Glyphosate that Monsanto submitted to regulators across the globe to show that the product is safe are for a different form of Glyphosate than is used in the products that the company sells.

The substance used for testing purposes is called Technical Glyphosate Acid, or N-Phophonomethyl glycine. The salts and esters of Glyphosate, such as Potassium Glyphosate, Ammonium Glyphosate, and Isopropylamine Glyphosate are the three substances currently used in all Monsanto Glyphosate-based products.  

According to Samsel:

There are no chronic long-term studies on these three chemical salts and ester of GLYPHOSATE. All approvals were based on the Glyphosate Technical acid form, there is a big difference. These salts are far more effective biologically than Glyphosate Technical acid form. They do more damage even without the surfactants and adjuvants because it is the salts and esters of Glyphosate that are responsible for the damage to biology stemming from its behavior in the universal solvent, water.

For example, according to the EPA’s Assessment of Ecological Risk for Glyphosate Potassium Salt, the actual product was not tested. What was tested was Technical Glyphosate Acid, a less toxic substance.

From the EPA document:

As you can clearly see, this assessment is for Glyphosate Potassium Salt. Later on, in the document, it clearly states that the testing ingredient was not Glyphosate Potassium Salt, but Technical Glyphosate Acid. The agency is considering them to be the same thing for testing purposes.

This is no technical error. It is deliberate, as is apparent in the following section of the document.

And the results? Based on the tests conducted on Technical Glyphosate Acid only, Glyphosate Potassium Salt is deemed at “low concern for risk to estuarine/aquatic species following chronic exposure.”

This type of chicanery is unacceptable. If I was to advertise goat milk for sale and when the customer gets to my ranch to purchase it I hand him a container filled with goat urine labeled “goat milk” instead, I would be drawn and quartered for false advertising, attempted poisoning, and run out of town on a rail. If Monsanto does the same thing, the company gets rich because the EPA has put its seal of approval on the whole bait and switch caper. And you cannot tell me that someone at Monsanto or in the EPA does not know the difference between Glyphosate Technica

This type of chicanery is unacceptable. If I was to advertise goat milk for sale, and when the customer gets to my ranch to purchase it I hand him a container filled with goat urine labeled “goat milk” instead, I would be drawn and quartered for false advertising, attempted poisoning, and ran out of town on a rail. If Monsanto does the same thing, the company gets rich because the EPA has put its seal of approval on the whole bait and switch caper. And you cannot tell me that someone at Monsanto or in the EPA does not know the difference between Glyphosate Technical Acid and Glyphosate Potassium Salt.
As Samsel states (personal communication, Jan. 24, 2016):

It’s like Monsanto getting the approvals for table salt, sodium chloride, to be used on food and then going back to the EPA and saying - Oh BTW, we have another salt of sodium we want to register, and the EPA lets them use the same testing that they used for sodium chloride. However, the new salt is SODIUM CYANIDE, and a lot of people are now dying !!!!!

No, this is not Sodium Cyanide, but the relevance is clear. You cannot test for one substance and use the results of that test for another substance to show safety. It is unethical, an abuse of power, and puts the people relying on the accuracy of a government agency to protect their health at risk. It also puts into question each and every test the EPA has performed on each and every substance that it has declared as “safe.” If this is happening with Roundup, what else is it happening

The information is always right under our noses, but since the products using Glyphosate and other toxic formulations are declared “safe” by EPA -- that Big Brother agency that is supposed to protect us -- most of us don’t even look any closer or question the “science” behind the label. We depend on the EPA to do our thinking for us. When will we learn? Maybe when the diseases hit home and the correlation begins to get real.

And now, knowing this information, can we trust anything that the EPA has approved as “safe?”

 


[1] The information in the paper above regarding Glyphosate’s effects on gut bacteria, nutrient deficiencies, and vitamins and amino acids, endocrine disruption and the impact on enzymes originated from the research conducted by Samsel and Seneff.

 

Related ARTICLES

Yucca Mountain – Sacred Native Land & Proposed Nuclear Waste Dump

Yucca Mountain – Sacred Native Land & Proposed Nuclear Waste Dump

Once again, the federal government proves itself as trustworthy as a two-headed rattler on methamphetamine.
Why would AIPAC dump Trump?

Why would AIPAC dump Trump?

It is possible that AIPAC was worried that Trump wouldn’t be pro-Israel enough, after last week’s gaffe when Trump said he would be “neutral” between Israel and the Palestinians.

08 April 2016

by Max J. Schindler

Thank You Mr. Trump: You have Stripped the Cloak of “Conservatism” from the GOP Establishment

Thank You Mr. Trump: You have Stripped the Cloak of “Conservatism” from the GOP Establishment

Please understand that this is NOT like any presidential election we have seen in this country...maybe since 1860.

02 April 2016

by Chuck Baldwin

POPULAR ARTICLES

Not Found

OPINION

Vladimir Golstein

Vladimir Golstein

The Danderous Acceptance of Donald Trump

James N. Green

James N. Green

Politics in Brazil: Fasten Your Seat Belts!

Barbara H. Peterson

Barbara H. Peterson

Health officials confirm spread of Zika virus through sexual contact in Texas, first in US

Danny Haiphong

Danny Haiphong

WHY IS OTTO(SUPER)MAN ERDOGAN LOSING HIS CHARISMA?

Miray Aslan

Miray Aslan

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Navid Nasr

Navid Nasr

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Writers

chief editor

Joshua Tartakovsky

Analysis should serve as a method to better understand our world, not to obscure it.

Materials: 42

Specialization: Israel and the Middle East, US politics

Materials: 7

Specialization: Balkans, NATO and EU policies, Strategic communications

Materials: 3

Specialization: Foreign politics, Immigration, Human rights.

Materials: 2

Specialization: Political Science, Social Anthropology

Materials: 3

Specialization: Eastern Europe

Materials: 14

Specialization: Industrial Safety, Corporations

Materials: 12

Specialization: Eastern Europe, Labor movement

Materials: 3

Specialization: American history, way of life, and principles

Danielle Ryan

Ireland

Materials: 10

Specialization: US foreign policy, US-Russia relations and media bias

Materials: 20

Specialization: War, Racism, Capitalist exploitation, Civil rights

Materials: 8

Specialization: Modern Japanese History, Modern Chinese History, Military History, History of Counterinsurgency, History of Disobedience, Dynamics of Atrocities in Wartime

Dovid Katz

Lithuania

Materials: 3

Specialization: Holocaust Revisionism and Geopolitics; East European Far Right & Human Rights; Yiddish Studies & Litvak Culture

Materials: 20

Specialization: History, Catalunya, Spain, Geopolitics, Nationalism in Europe, Islamization, Immigration

Materials: 5

Materials: 3

Specialization: migration, international relations

Materials: 1

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy and strategies, BRICS/SCO

Materials: 19

Specialization: Balkans, Yugoslavia

Materials: 10

Specialization: Jihadist Groups, Islamic Terrorism, Global Security

Materials: 4

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 4

Specialization: Media and government relations

Materials: 2

Specialization: Latin America, Brazil

Jay Watts

Canada

Materials: 2

Specialization: History, Marxism-Leninism, Imperialism, Anti-imperialism.

Materials: 2

Specialization: International Relations, Sociology, Geostrategy

Materials: 1

Specialization: civil rights

Lionel Baland

Belgium

Materials: 22

Specialization: Euroscepticism, Patriotic parties of Europe

Maram Susli

Australia

Materials: 3

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights, Racism, US politics

Materials: 1

Specialization: geopolitics, economics

Max J. Schindler

Palestine-Israel

Materials: 9

Specialization: Politics

Miray Aslan

Turkey

Materials: 12

Specialization: Media, Politics

Materials: 5

Specialization: Politics, International relations

Navid Nasr

Croatia

Materials: 13

Specialization: Global security, Politics

Materials: 9

Specialization: Development of European Union, Non-governmental organizations, Politics and economics in Baltic States

Materials: 9

Specialization: Greece, Crisis of the US hegemony; Israel / Occupied Palestine, Oppression of Black people in the US

Materials: 4

Specialization: geopolitics, Russia, USSR

Pedro Marin

Brazil

Materials: 17

Specialization: Latin America, Ukraine, North Korea

Materials: 13

Specialization: Sustainable development, International relations, Comparative European politics, European integration, Eastern European politics and EU-Russia relations

Materials: 8

Specialization: Politics

Materials: 16

Specialization: Counterterrorist Finance

Seyit Aldogan

Greece

Materials: 3

Specialization: ISIS, Middle East, Globalization, Migrant crisis

Materials: 1

Specialization: Head of "Srebrenica Historical Project"

Materials: 3

Specialization: Economy, Social politics

Stevan Gajic

Serbia

Materials: 1

Specialization: Full time researcher at the Institute for European Studies

Materials: 5

Specialization: Geopolitics, Geoeconomics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights

Tobias Nase

Germany

Materials: 8

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy, Ukraine

Valerijus Simulik

Lithuania

Materials: 2

Specialization: Politics and economics in Baltic States, education and science, non - governmental organizations, globalization and EU

Van Gelis

Greece

Materials: 17

Specialization: Middle East

Materials: 1

Specialization: Kosovo, Serbia, Belgrad bombing

Materials: 5

Specialization: international relations, Russia

toTop