Global Independent Analytics
Scott Bennett
Scott Bennett

Location: USA

Specialization: Counterterrorist Finance

Replacing President Erdogan: The Coming Military Coup D’etat in Turkey

As the old saying goes, “What’s good for the goose, is good for the gander.”

Geopolitically this means, “What the U.S. did to Ukraine, Russia can do to Turkey.”  

As Russian President Vladimir Putin alluded to, it is only a matter of time before Turkey’s military recognize the courage, strength, and wisdom Allah has blessed them with as warriors, and act as warriors by defending their own Turkish citizens from the insane and self-destructive recklessness of President Erdogan—who will very soon bring down upon Turkey  the curses of God and his destruction if he is not forcibly removed from power by the righteousness of the Turkish military. As much as Allah has taken away Erdogan's mind, Allah will defend all soldiers who work to free Turkey from Erdogan’s tyrannical and sinful grasp. 

As a former psychological warfare officer, I look at this problem and solution through the enemy's eyes, first and foremost, for it is the only way to "influence the mind and heart" of the enemy. So here is what the Turkish Muslim will think and act. 

The average Turk will understand now that Turkey has a very simple choice:  Either replace insanity with intelligence and weakness with power, and thereby soon discover a new destiny of peace, independence, wealth, prosperity, and hope; or continue on the present insane, downward course Turkey’s President Erdogan is chasing, and inevitably be hated, torn apart, and eventually forgotten by the world (and Allah) under the smoldering ashes of civil war and destruction.  Only the Turkish military has the honor and courage to make this choice, for only the Turkish soldier has the strength to resist becoming himself a tyrant who betrays trust by harming the civilians who obey them, and hurting Allah who loves them.    

This means Allah has created Turkey’s military to save the Turkish people.  Allah knows Turkey’s military are the only men with the honor and intelligence to save their nation from slavery or destruction. 

Erdogan has been practicing magic, going to soothsayers and fortune tellers, and accessing the occult—issues that are strictly forbidden in Islam. He has also been murdering journalists who have exposed the criminal oil smuggling operation he and his son have organized. This is a sin against Islam, and must be cleansed from Turkey’s name and her people. 

The military must stop this because it is bringing a curse upon Turkey in the eyes of the world. 

Every honorable member of the Turkish military was outraged and sickened by the dishonor and cowardice of the Turkmen mercenaries who fired machine guns at the unarmed parachuting pilots as they descended through the sky, resulting in the death of one.  There was no honor in this cowardly act, and the Turkish military were stained with this blood and insult.  The military’s only hope of redeeming themselves, and regaining their self-respect as warriors, is to remove the political powers which are perverting and manipulating them, and dishonoring and destroying the great country which they took an oath to honor and protect.  If they are warriors, they will act; if they don’t act, they are fools or cowards, and will be punished by Allah for betraying their oath of honor. 

Turkish citizens are being branded by Turkmen mercenaries as barbaric monsters who lust to kill children, kill women, kill unarmed and defenseless men, kill journalists.  These Turkmen then claiming political and religious blessing, but in reality incur the curse of Allah and his world, for “Allah condemns these acts, and hates cowards, and does not accept their sacrifice.  In fact, he will judge and condemn the military who empower these false and wicked rulers who blaspheme his character and insult and shame his desire for mercy by their actions of murder, rape, drug taking, and stealing the oil of another country, which they are a guest in.” 

The Solution

Concerning the Erdogan-Turkey-Russia situation, here is the solution. 

Quite simply, the topics of discussion, the language, the visual imagery we need to begin to use in media and discussions is the language of "military overthrow/coup de e’tat" of Erdogan, and his replacement by a military government.  As difficult as this may sound to some, it is the fastest and easiest way to diffuse the problem, take the initiative out of the hands of the U.S./NATO powers, and protect Russian military lives, as well as guarantee the preservation of Syria/Assad.  Of course history demonstrates the success of these operations in response to such dire conditions; they lead to stability and orderliness.  The civil population hold a mythical obedience and love of their military, and therefore automatically will follow the military's instructions.  Additionally the terrorists/extremists will suddenly go on retreat, instead of continuing on their un-interrupted offensive.  We have as historical examples:  Iraq's Saadam Hussein; Pakistan's General Musharraf; Libya's Colonel Muamar Gadhafi; the Philippines General Marcos (whose defense Minister incidentally was a friend of my family); and others.  A healthy contempt for humanity is an effective inoculation against manipulation and deception—which are the precursors of slavery and death—which may be President Erdogan's subconscious objective. 

Now of course we fully understand the backlash and fear that "human rights/liberals" will have, but it is more important to establish a military government/strongman personality to rule, while a new election--based on secular tolerance and non-radical, non-extremist Wahhabi ideology--is re-scheduled.  Recall this was the solution of the Egyptian military when Obama tried to force the Muslim Brotherhood takeover of Egypt.  The military stood up and said no, and re-captured the country.  Yes there have been problems and shortcomings from military government’s but there is also an order and safety and passivity which helps make neighbor countries more tolerant of each other and non-interventionist.   

Headlines of newspapers and internet blogs and talk shows should focus on analyzing and popularizing the idea of "Miliary Coup D’etat in Turkey: Who The Next Turkish Government Might Be.”  And thereby plant the seeds that a military review of Erdogan is being seriously considered, given the potential war  against Russia, and the Russian sanctions against Turkey which may be snowballing this effect.  The weaknesses, the flaws, the delusions, the ISIS’ religious ideology and fanaticism of Erdogan need to be accentuated, and he needs to be isolated as a madman in the early stages of his "Grand Caliphate Ruler Dream.”  Erdogan needs to be exposed as an enemy of Europe, a trafficker in human refugees and ISIS invaders, and may in fact be directly involved in the Paris attacks.   

The more Erdogan is connected to human trafficking of invaders into Europe and financing ISIS through Gulf Nations (specifically using HSBC, UBS, Credit Suisse, and other international Saudi Banks); and trying to goad the NATO alliance into defending Turkey as the flashpoint of a conflict, the more a military coup will begin to seem the next logical step....and some pro-Syria, pro-Russian, Pro-China, group will take it.  If Iran will give a blessing and their respect to the new Turkey military government, then this too would be an enormous benefit.  The new Turkey military government could also be inspired by a generous percentage of the gas pipeline President Putin may want to resurrect with Turkey. 

So a lot of things could begin to move, if bloggers, journalists and researchers take the lead and begin to repeat, repeat, repeat the language and very real possibility  of a military takeover of Turkey and removal of Erdogan, for the benefit of Turkey, and Europe.   

This may also satisfy the blood payment Russia should demand for the cold-blooded backstabbing murder of the Russian Pilot shot down by a Turkish F-16 and shot and killed by Turkmen during his parachute descent.  It may also demonstrate Putin as not only a prophetic leader, but the man the world will follow into the next phase of history. 

Managing NATO 

Another fragile and potentially explosive issue that requires prudent handling, is the potential NATO reaction to any political changes in Turkey.  The question is, if President Erdogan is suddenly removed from power--whether by military coup, political no-confidence vote and impeachment, or criminal arrest—how will NATO react, how will the United States react, and what is the best countermeasure or response to the NATO and U.S. reaction?  Will NATO and the United States have different opinions and reactions to the event, or will they combine, advance, and defend a unified position?  

It must be clearly understood that European nations are experiencing major uprisings and protests from the majority of their populations who are rising up to stop the flood of refugees into their countries, because they instinctively know uncontrolled immigration will only lead to cultural divisions and conflict.  Therefore this can be a powerful issue for building bridges, cultivating empathy, and developing leverage to influence European policy towards NATO actions.  

Strategically, it is most effective to split the U.S. identity, history, and agenda away from the NATO and European countries identities, history, and agendas.  The United States and European countries should be seen as separate and distinct nations and cultures, as history demonstrates, and thereby reminded that political alliances are based on mutual trust and empathy.  This subtly inclines any dialogue with European and NATO leaders (and populations) to review and analyze the recent “violations of trust and empathy” as demonstrated by the U.S. failure to stop the immigration invasion of European nations as a result of the U.S.-driven Middle East wars in Libya, Iraq, and now Syria.  

It is essential to identify that the U.S. military hegemony over Europe gained after World War II committed the U.S. to defend Europe from invasion.  However the U.S. failed to honor this commitment, whether out of fear, ignorance, or choice, by allowing Europe to be over-run by masses of invading civilian refugees and non-refugees (some of whom are terrorists infiltrating for future violence).  This is a powerful act of failure which most Europeans would find agreement with, and appreciate enlightenment about.

It goes without saying that the NATO purpose was originally to defend Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and a few other nations from a Russian military invasion and takeover—at least that’s how it was originally sold to the public.  However now, post-Cold War, with Russia no longer interested in such campaigns, and instead intertwined with European economies and society, NATO logically must be recalibrated and redefined to modernize it.  And that becomes the paradigm around which the new European-NATO mindset, as well as the American mindset, should logically be redefined and realigned. 

Given that presently Turkey is a NATO member, despite being reviled by many European political leaders for Erdogan’s various offenses and violations against European values, Turkey still maintains a legal right to demand NATO respond to any outside attack.  Therefore any disruption of Erdogan must be seen as clearly coming from within the country’s own population, and a movement by the people to preserve their lives, their peace, and their right to responsible and accountable government.  By defining any coup, overthrow, or removal of President Erdogan as a natural right of free and reasonable people, freedom and reason will become both the origin and the final objective of the changing of Erdogan’s rule.  Any opposition will therefore be defined as the opposite of freedom and reason—and should be harshly described as slavery and insanity.  Which, ironically enough, President Vladamir Putin has already been doing in his public statements.  

Putin has said, “Allah has taken away Erdogan’s sanity,” in his explanation to the Russian Duma of Turkey’s “stab in the back and shoot down of a Russian bomber over Syrian airspace.”  It is significant that this resembles the old testament story about the ancient Babylon King Nebuchadnezzar who because of his own pride and sense of invulnerability, was cursed by God and forced out of his kingdom into the wilderness where he “ate grass for seven years, before he was given back his right mind.”  Since Turkish Muslims know this story intimately, the allusion to Erdogan could be sufficient to spark the necessary sense of betrayal, resentment, and commitment to change.

Conclusion

Throughout the course of our lives, choosing defines our character. Choosing requires the strength and courage of a warrior, because we must be willing to see ourselves as we truly are, and defend who we choose to be and the direction we choose to get there.  As soldiers in our military, citizens of society, members of our tribe, people in our family, we choose our identity and destiny.  Today the nation of Turkey is being driven towards hell, and only Turkey’s military can turn it around, and save it.  Allah requires this of them, as part of their fulfillment of the 5 pillars of Islam. 

If Turkey continues to choose prostituting itself to the whims and desires of a NATO/ American dominated agenda of social hedonism and economic slavery, it will be signing its own death warrant and beheading itself, as radical extremist elements in its population rise in rebellion against the spirit of material godlessness it cannot live with.   

Instead, its only hope is to make a quick, clean break from the current regime’s agenda, and immediately launch a fresh start by ejecting President Erdogan from power, and redefine itself as the historical interlocutor and land bridge between Europe and Asia; and take a balanced position between the interests of America and Europe, and the interests of Russia-Iran-China-India and the Gulf Nations.   

By defining itself as loyal to none, and open to all, it will be the Muslim Switzerland, and thereby make peace with Muslim elements and nations in need of neutral representation to Europe. 

This may salvage the Turkish oil smuggling and sales operations, which Russian-Syria may even concede as part of a military government takeover of Turkey; otherwise they will obviously lose every single oil truck and oil refinery that comes into Russian-French-British cross-hairs. 

 

Related ARTICLES

NATO’s Wish List: de-Finlandization in Europe

NATO’s Wish List: de-Finlandization in Europe

NATO is currently working hard to make Finland and Sweden join the military bloc. De-Finlandization is clearly high on the agenda.

25 May 2016

by Normunds Grostins

US warship dangerously close to Russian coast?

US warship dangerously close to Russian coast?

A little context always puts things into better perspective, so here we go. Grab an atlas.

18 April 2016

by Danielle Ryan

What are European Values and What Do They Mean?

What are European Values and What Do They Mean?

Our values – usually called "European values" – were a staple of discussions in the 1990s.

04 April 2016

by Patrick Armstrong

POPULAR ARTICLES

Not Found

OPINION

Vladimir Golstein

Vladimir Golstein

The Danderous Acceptance of Donald Trump

James N. Green

James N. Green

Politics in Brazil: Fasten Your Seat Belts!

Barbara H. Peterson

Barbara H. Peterson

Health officials confirm spread of Zika virus through sexual contact in Texas, first in US

Danny Haiphong

Danny Haiphong

WHY IS OTTO(SUPER)MAN ERDOGAN LOSING HIS CHARISMA?

Miray Aslan

Miray Aslan

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Navid Nasr

Navid Nasr

How relations between Saudi Arabia and Iran reached a breaking point

Writers

chief editor

Joshua Tartakovsky

Analysis should serve as a method to better understand our world, not to obscure it.

Materials: 42

Specialization: Israel and the Middle East, US politics

Materials: 7

Specialization: Balkans, NATO and EU policies, Strategic communications

Materials: 3

Specialization: Foreign politics, Immigration, Human rights.

Materials: 2

Specialization: Political Science, Social Anthropology

Materials: 3

Specialization: Eastern Europe

Materials: 14

Specialization: Industrial Safety, Corporations

Materials: 12

Specialization: Eastern Europe, Labor movement

Materials: 3

Specialization: American history, way of life, and principles

Danielle Ryan

Ireland

Materials: 10

Specialization: US foreign policy, US-Russia relations and media bias

Materials: 20

Specialization: War, Racism, Capitalist exploitation, Civil rights

Materials: 8

Specialization: Modern Japanese History, Modern Chinese History, Military History, History of Counterinsurgency, History of Disobedience, Dynamics of Atrocities in Wartime

Dovid Katz

Lithuania

Materials: 3

Specialization: Holocaust Revisionism and Geopolitics; East European Far Right & Human Rights; Yiddish Studies & Litvak Culture

Materials: 20

Specialization: History, Catalunya, Spain, Geopolitics, Nationalism in Europe, Islamization, Immigration

Materials: 5

Materials: 3

Specialization: migration, international relations

Materials: 1

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy and strategies, BRICS/SCO

Materials: 19

Specialization: Balkans, Yugoslavia

Materials: 10

Specialization: Jihadist Groups, Islamic Terrorism, Global Security

Materials: 4

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 4

Specialization: Media and government relations

Materials: 2

Specialization: Latin America, Brazil

Jay Watts

Canada

Materials: 2

Specialization: History, Marxism-Leninism, Imperialism, Anti-imperialism.

Materials: 2

Specialization: International Relations, Sociology, Geostrategy

Materials: 1

Specialization: civil rights

Lionel Baland

Belgium

Materials: 22

Specialization: Euroscepticism, Patriotic parties of Europe

Maram Susli

Australia

Materials: 3

Specialization: Geopolitics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights, Racism, US politics

Materials: 1

Specialization: geopolitics, economics

Max J. Schindler

Palestine-Israel

Materials: 9

Specialization: Politics

Miray Aslan

Turkey

Materials: 12

Specialization: Media, Politics

Materials: 5

Specialization: Politics, International relations

Navid Nasr

Croatia

Materials: 13

Specialization: Global security, Politics

Materials: 9

Specialization: Development of European Union, Non-governmental organizations, Politics and economics in Baltic States

Materials: 9

Specialization: Greece, Crisis of the US hegemony; Israel / Occupied Palestine, Oppression of Black people in the US

Materials: 4

Specialization: geopolitics, Russia, USSR

Pedro Marin

Brazil

Materials: 17

Specialization: Latin America, Ukraine, North Korea

Materials: 13

Specialization: Sustainable development, International relations, Comparative European politics, European integration, Eastern European politics and EU-Russia relations

Materials: 8

Specialization: Politics

Materials: 16

Specialization: Counterterrorist Finance

Seyit Aldogan

Greece

Materials: 3

Specialization: ISIS, Middle East, Globalization, Migrant crisis

Materials: 1

Specialization: Head of "Srebrenica Historical Project"

Materials: 3

Specialization: Economy, Social politics

Stevan Gajic

Serbia

Materials: 1

Specialization: Full time researcher at the Institute for European Studies

Materials: 5

Specialization: Geopolitics, Geoeconomics

Materials: 2

Specialization: Civil rights

Tobias Nase

Germany

Materials: 8

Specialization: Syria, US Foreign policy, Ukraine

Valerijus Simulik

Lithuania

Materials: 2

Specialization: Politics and economics in Baltic States, education and science, non - governmental organizations, globalization and EU

Van Gelis

Greece

Materials: 17

Specialization: Middle East

Materials: 1

Specialization: Kosovo, Serbia, Belgrad bombing

Materials: 5

Specialization: international relations, Russia

toTop